NZ now ranks at bottom of developed world
The latest Unicef report has us languishing at the bottom of the developed world in relation to the health and welfare our children and youth. This report was based on the data our government collects and concerningly, with regards to child poverty, a ranking wasn't provided because of a refusal to follow standard practice (an admission of failure?). In many documented areas we are seriously neglecting our young people (ranking numbers are determined by the data provided from a maximum of 41 developed countries):
- Child Poverty (41/41?) I consider that we must be by far the worst in the developed world for child poverty when the Government refuses to use the same measures as other countries so that we can be ranked. Our Children's Commissioner and the Child Poverty Monitor currently state that 14% of our children suffer from material hardship. We have a much higher threshold to determine this and require 7 elements to recognise hardship, while most other countries use only two. The US is ranked 33 out of 37 for child poverty and they have 21% of their children in households living below the poverty threshold. 28% of our children live below the poverty line and 16% live in jobless households, so I would surmise that we could be the worst. We also have the most expensive housing in the world and a homelessness problem that has exploded in recent years. Between 2006 and 2013 homelessness grew by 25% and involved 1% of the population and 53% of our homeless were families with children. Now that shortages have become increasingly pronounced over the four years since then, I would suggest around 2% of the population is now homeless and many more are living in substandard housing. Third world diseases like rheumatic fever are now common place here, and are directly related to housing poverty. New Zealand is clearly too afraid to provide relevant statistics to enable us to be ranked.
- Teen Suicide (34/34) We are the worst by a great margin. The median number of teen suicides per 1,000 for developed nations is around 7.5, while 15.5 of our 15-19 year olds take their own lives. This is a shocking indictment on the ability of families to support their teens and our severely under-resourced mental health system. I can imagine few developed countries that would lock struggling youth in adult prisons because of a shortage of youth facilities. Those specialised youth facilities that do exist are run like prisons for hardened criminals. Youth prisoners can be locked in their cells for 19 hours a day, which is classified as torture, is emotionally damaging and unlikely to support rehabilitation.
- Jobless Households (35/37) 16% of our children live in households not supported by employment. Benefits have not kept up with inflation and many of these beneficiary families will be experiencing high levels of poverty. There are also those in real need who don't receive a benefit, despite entitlements, because of bureaucratic difficulties and many are forced onto the street with no income at all.
- Environmental Awareness (34/36) The National Government forced National Standards in Education on schools, requiring a heavy emphasis on literacy and numeracy above all other learning areas. Consequently our 15 year olds have less understanding of the key environmental issues facing our planet then most other countries. Given that our waterways have become seriously degraded over the last ten years, and we have the highest number of species facing extinction in the world, this is concerning. Only 49% knew something about at least five environmental issues, while the average in other countries was 62% (82% for Portugal). Keeping our young people ignorant of New Zealand's many environmental crises is a form of state control to reduce any scrutiny of our current policies. New Zealand has also been globally ridiculed for its weak climate change targets, we are little better than Trump.
- Teenage Birth Rate (36/41) We have one of the highest rates of teenage births (23.3 births out of every 1000). With increased alcohol consumption and binge drinking amongst young females we are also experiencing greater numbers of Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder. While it is hard to put an accurate figure on numbers it is estimated that between 1 and 5 births in every 100 have FASD and a large proportion is likely to come from younger mothers.
- Inequity in Education (34/39) We have one of the greatest disparities of educational achievement when related to socio-economic influences. Private and high decile schools capture significantly more funding and resources per student than low decile schools.
- Inclusive Economy (34/40) The unemployment rate for Maori youth is almost 26% (14% for non-Maori). 90,000 young people in NZ have no training or job to go to. Despite what the government says about our economy, the jobs available in NZ are predominantly low waged and insecure compared to most other developed nations. We also have a youth rate where we employ young people at lower rates than adults who do the same job. We have a large number of casual, minimum waged jobs and we also work amongst the longest hours.
- Homicide and Bullying (33/40) We have the second highest rates of bullying in the OECD and concerning levels of youth committing violent crimes. Family violence is a massive issue in New Zealand and violence begets violence.
- Child Murder (31/37) the number of children in NZ who have been murdered is a national shame. We have the worst levels of family violence in the developed world but our violence counselling services are underfunded and our social worker numbers have been reduced. The damning review of CYFs resulted in the development of a new Ministry, but unless it is properly resourced we risk repeating the same horrific mistakes. Domestic violence costs the country around $7 billion (estimated around 525,000 harmed last year) and the Government's injection of a paltry $347 million over four years will not even scratch the surface nor pay for the social workers needed to do the work.
- Neonatal Mortality Rate (28/36) New Zealand used to have a world regarded Plunket system and many rural maternity hospitals to support mothers and babies. Over the last decade or so we have seen mothers pushed out of maternity wards because of a lack of beds and rural hospitals closed. Plunket struggles to offer the same level of service as in the past.
- Reducing Inequality (26/41) New Zealand was once considered an egalitarian society but since the 1990s we have experienced the highest increase in inequality in the developed world. Our efforts to address this are well less than average. Norway, Iceland and Finland have been the most effective at addressing child poverty, there is no real reason why we couldn't follow their lead rather than following neoliberal policies being pursued by the US and UK (which clearly don't work).
- Food Insecurity (21/41) In the land of milk and honey, where we export more food than we can consume, a high percentage of our children go hungry or suffer from a poor diet. Milk is cheaper in the countries we export to and 32% of our children are obese or overweight, largely due to poor diets. This Government removed the requirement for healthy food in schools. Charities like KidsCan have had to take on the Government's responsibilities regarding providing food and basic necessities. KidsCan claims that almost 300,000 children live in hardship, 1 in 4 don't have the basics and 3,855 are missing out because the charity does not have the resources to meet demand.
- Education Performance (15/38) A decade ago our children's academic performance put us in the top 4 in the world, we have now dropped to 15th. 71.9% of our 15 year olds currently achieve baseline competency in reading, mathematics and science (Finland and Canada have over 80% achieving this). We have a long under-achieving tail and yet our special education support is severely underfunded and our school support staffing is under resourced.
The shift to the bottom of the world for our care of children and youth has been a steady process for at least three decades, as neoliberal policies have replaced the welfare state vision of the first Labour Government. The "applied Christianity" ethos of Michael Savage, and the idea of the Government leading a caring society, has been replaced by viewing the support for the vulnerable as a cost to be avoided and doing as little as possible. Under this National Government, over the last nine years, the word "crisis" is being increasingly used and most could have been avoided with proper planning and investment.
The belief that more can be delivered with less and the use of narrow targets has created an overworked, under qualified and stressed social service and medical workforce. Consequently we have a rapidly growing prison population and facilities bursting at the seams. Prison staff are forced to resort to long periods of lockdown and physical restraint rather than running decent rehabilitation programmes. Over a billion dollars is being spent on new prisons and yet rehabilitation and the substandard housing and social pressures that contribute to offending have token amounts invested.
Our failing prisons, struggling hospitals and social services, extreme housing crisis and low wage economy is forcing more and more families into lifestyles and living conditions that are rapidly becoming third world. New Zealand should be the best country in the world to bring up children and youth. We have a relatively small population, abundant resources and were once a world leader in education, child health and family support. We are now ranked near the bottom because of poor governance, neoliberal austerity measures and a lack of compassion.
We need a change of government and the strongest policies to address poverty come from the Green Party. Party vote Green to ensure that there is a strong coalition partner for Labour and real progressive change can be achieved. The future of around 295,000 children, currently suffering in various degrees of poverty, is dependent on who we vote for over the coming week!
We need a change of government and the strongest policies to address poverty come from the Green Party. Party vote Green to ensure that there is a strong coalition partner for Labour and real progressive change can be achieved. The future of around 295,000 children, currently suffering in various degrees of poverty, is dependent on who we vote for over the coming week!
Comments
I fear we may not see the return of a more caring, thoughtful, long-term planning style of governance until the generations (that do not need naming) that have been most heavily brainwashed and materially rewarded by the myths of free markets and American-style capitalism have mercifully kicked the bucket. Is it too pathetically optimistic to hope that a Labour-Greens combo would undo much of the damage? Or are we too far gone?...
Voters had a choice of continuing with a Government that obviously wasn't that great, but wasn't destroying the country too dramatically, or voting for something that was likely to implode shortly after being elected.
This time we have Labour and the Greens working together, stable leadership, some strong alternative policies and a more obvious mess that needs a fresh approach to clean it up.
Spread the word ;-)
The focus on presidential campaigns (just the two main leaders) has been counter-productive. The Labour and Green candidates have some strong credentials and would do a much better job as ministers than National's arrogant and ideologically driven lot.
I also hope we can change the current governance style to be more democratic and focus more on evidence and good process.
National Governments do not have a good track record. It was Ruth Richardson's 1991 Mother of all Budgets that drastically cut benefits, caused child poverty to double within a year and shifted us dramatically to a low wage economy. It was also National that changed building regulations that resulted in $13 billion of leaky building repairs. Many of the newer damp unhealthy homes that many families are forced to live in are because of National's preference for industry driven compliance. Pike River was the most dramatic outcome of this policy.
This National Government has also had plenty of good advice and prior warning about what is happening and chose to do very little. This is an ideologically and lobby driven government that tries to do the minimum it can get away with, and this only creates more costs and suffering. The top quintile of income earners and property owners have done exceptionally well but few others.
Nine years under National has caused:
-Environmental degradation to get far worse
-Our education system plummet in the world rankings
-Social housing stock reduced and poorly maintained. Bill English claims it will cost around $1.5 billion just to get existing houses up to scratch, let alone make up the 30,000 housing shortfall.
-We have become the most expensive country for housing in the world.
-Our levels of corruption have increased (tax haven, high level bribes, OIA requests delayed and refused)
-National has no plan and no idea of what to do, most policies have failed and the country has suffered from mismanagement (Solid Energy, Novopay, transport chaos, Sky City debacle, Christchurch recovery mismanagement). Our public and private debt has exploded.
A Labour/Green Government will have the expertise and responsible policies to turn things around.
National employs more PR people than policy analysts, don't believe the spin.
http://www.radionz.co.nz/news/political/333326/mbie-ignored-warning-over-housing-affordability-measure
Last paragraph in the article.
This is the type of dishonesty and sleaze which, to me, defines National. Utter, utter disdain for the truth, and absolutely no obligations to accountability. You want alternative facts? There's your alternative facts.
Remember that John Key once called the highly-regarded investigative journalist Glen Greenwald a "loser" when Glen reported on something that displeased his Baron-of-Banking John Key. Loser, hmm now what other well-known politician likes to use that word?...
And bsprout, I remember the vox pops from the news around the Panama papers. It was tragic. People... just didn't care. Were they edited to make it sound that way? It is possible. But the fact that any people at all aren't bothered by this show the problem, not understanding what it really means and stands for - the exact opposite of the popular notion of what NZ is supposed to be about (fairness, equality and other things that now seem like myths). We are in a very real sense turning into a little mini-America.
Interestingly the Green Party, in opposition, regularly quotes from advice that Treasury, Ministries, special reports and commissioners have provided to the Government, but has been ignored.
I agree Squidface, the US (and the UK) have provided many models for this Government when better ones have existed elsewhere. Ideology, not evidence, rules!
We are very competitive sporting nation, but our best sports teams work well together and if we want our country as a whole to work and function well, we can't allow so many of our team to end up operating with a fraction of their potential. The strength and resilience of our country is dependent on as many as possible thriving and engaging positively in our communities and economy. At least 25% of our "team" are seriously struggling and living third world lives. If 25% of our All Blacks or America's Cup squads had that level of dysfunction it would be a national crisis and yet we appear to be happy to condemn around 30% of our children to futures shaped by poverty, violence and depravation.
It's not logical to most of us except those that profit from a cheap workforce and corporate subsidies.
I hope you can still vote from where you are and can help make a change ;-)
George Lakoff has identified as "the strict father" the cognitive frame of the American christo- and crypto-fascist ideologues, in what Jim Wallis called "God's Politics" (2005 book). And yes, alistair, you have a point, it is possible for permissive and ideologues of the left to overlook the creation for the distribution of wealth. But, hello, who are those who work hard? ..after paying the rentier class and being manipulated by all kinds of "market forces", the working poor have bugger all left over to save. I was amazed to see last year documentary story-telling about Ayn Rand in the intro to the ?BBC doco on the new cyber-mandarins, "All Watched Over by Machines of Loving Grace". Poor Ayn Rand was sn aspergic sociopath. These stats about the radical breakdown of New Zealands QUALITY OF LIFE are the tragic underbelly of Generation Ponzi whose political focus for over 30 years has been crude stats about our unsustainable STANDARD OF LIVING. We are witnessing now the Collapse of Globalism (John Ralston Saul, 2005). What time is this? It is the "interregnum?. In the coming months we need to articulate a positive nationslism, avoiding the opportunists and populists for a sane, humane and ecological role for our Treaty Nation state.
http://www.stuff.co.nz/business/money/69348442/new-zealand-superannuation-the-facts-and-the-fiction
While I wouldn't deny our retirees their inflation adjusted universal state income, it is very different for struggling families whose benefits are not inflation adjusted. Only 5% of our elderly suffer from poverty, while at least 30% or more of our children experience poverty at some stage in their lives. We care for our past workers well but do little to support our future income earners.
What I find most concerning is that we have a rapidly growing demographic called the working poor, they work hard but cannot afford to put food on the table, pay their rent or meet the needs of their kids without support. Employers have not shared increases in productivity with their workers and wages have now been stagnating for many years, while food, accommodation and electricity costs have soared. The Working for Families tax credit is essentially a wage subsidy for employers who refuse to pay living wages (apparently it is uneconomic to pay wages that people can live on). The accommodation supplement is a subsidy for landlords and that has ensured that rents are kept higher that what a natural market would support. When I last checked the cost of both is approaching $8 billion a year.
As you would have seen in a link on my original post, it is only the wealthy who can easily access learning support and guarantee and good income. Statistics and research shows that now it is unlikely in NZ that someone born poor will be able to lift themselves out of poverty.
Spending on families and children is actually an investment in our future not a cost. We need to consider our welfare spending as providing a "hand up" rather than a "hand out" and fund the right kinds of support to make that happen. Instead of an ambulance at the top of the cliff to catch those who are struggling before they fall, the Government is just building more prisons instead.
Anthrodude, lets hope for a revolution of new ideas, that "Ponzi" victims can vote for, so that we can begin to build a resilient and prosperous New Zealand that recognises our ecological restraints.
While we're very appreciative of this and other assistance - it is as you say a wage subsidy for employers.
Change?? Yeah Right
Labour and NZ First have too much invested in the status quo to make meaningful changes. AND the changes they are suggesting are out-dated recycled Chardonnay-Socialism and nationalistic jingo-ism.
Please don't get people's hopes up that Labour/NZ First will make the slightest dent in these issues
I note you have missed any reference to the Green Party and yet it could be a significant player in the next Government. If that were so it would bring greater transparency in decision making, greater use of evidence and higher levels of investment in the future. The home insulation initiative of the Greens through an MOU with National in 2008 has probably made the most difference to struggling families than anything else National has done.
Have a look at some of the well costed and practical Green policies (more will be released over the next few months):
https://www.greens.org.nz/policy
New Zealand is the only developed country that I know of that has mortgage rates between 4 to 6%. Living in Europe, most mortgage rates are between 0.9% and 1.6%. This places a huge strain on the everyday economy of nearly every single person in NZ. A lower interest rate means more money to spend. More money to spend means more jobs, more jobs means less unemployment, and the state gets back the money by not having to pay out so much Welfare.
It's a simple equation, but everyone puts their hands over their eyes and chooses to ignore the fact that you're being robbed, and that the system is shooting itself in the foot.