Greens' Solar Sense and National's Nonsense

Russel Norman's recent announcement of the Green Party's solar energy initiative is a fiscally neutral, smart policy. Home owners will access cheap government loans that are attached to the house, not the person, and will be paid off through the rates bill. The policy is already being seen as a positive move by those who understand the benefits of solar energy. A $10,000 solar panel installation will save a home owner $28,000 over the 25 year life of the system.

Solar energy uptake has been slow in New Zealand compared to many other countries but it is by far the fastest growing energy sector. By having having a target of installing panels on 30,000 homes in the first term of government the Greens have set a realistic goal and allowed for a well managed growth of the industry.

The benefits of the policy go well beyond the 30,000 homes, it will also support the development of new businesses, in the same way that the home insulation scheme did, and will provide hundreds of jobs. Having an increase in demand for photovoltaic panels will support a reduction in manufacturing costs, so that future installations will become even cheaper.

For many households, especially those where winters are colder, power bills are a major part of their household budget. Although the average household power bill is around $2,000 a year it can be well over double that for those who live in the south.

Our own Invercargill home is pretty typical of many, it is a larger, brick and roughcast, character home built in 1932 (luckily it was built to face north as many weren't). We have insulation above the ceilings, underfloor insulation, some double glazing and recently installed solar water heating. Despite also having a heat pump and wood burner our electricity costs over the last year were over $3,300. We have also shopped around and have changed providers a number of times, which has not always been an easy process.

My sister and husband have a modest income but are now the proud owners of a life style block and have their house completely off the grid with a high performance solar system of panels and storage batteries that cost them $25,000 including installation costs. They are now self sufficient for their electricity needs and after 8 years or so the system will have paid for itself.



Friends have recently built a new house and paid $6,100 for 24 panels, $2.800 for an inverter and $9,000 for installation. Over January they received a $70 credit from Meridian for their excess generation.


Schools are also beginning to discover the economic value of solar energy and a high ranking Green Party candidate, Aaryn Barlow, is fronting a scheme to support the uptake. For the Greens, the use of solar energy is more than just a hypothetical idea, we are already putting it to practice.

National have already been burnt by the reception of the Greens' well received education policy when their own expensive education initiative received lukewarm support. Simon Bridges desperately suggested that the modest loans were somehow "magic money" and an unnecessary subsidy. Bridges incredibly didn't believe that solar energy was necessary in New Zealand. John Key bizarrely claimed that the scheme would destabilise the current system and would cause companies to increase charges. National would rather see people dependent on the current flawed system that has seen a 22% increase in power bills over their time in office.

We are now seeing a stark contrast between a government desperate to support the status quo of increasing charges and large company profits, while the future focussed Greens are truly progressive in their thinking.


Comments

Philip Todd said…
As long as the line charges are regulated. Power companies have for far to long shifted the usage charge to fixed charges so the retain the same cashflow. This has out weighed any savings consumers have made to the power used. Solar will always require some link to the electricity supply
bsprout said…
"Solar will always require some link to the electricity supply"

Not necessarily, Philip, my sister lives perfectly happily off the grid. I do agree that if the solar scheme becomes too successful it will threaten the profits of power companies, but if they increase charges it will only force more people to become self sufficient and they will suffer even more.

Many well built new houses actually need very little electricity if they use led lights, are well insulated and make use of passive solar heating.

I actually worry about struggling families and those who live in poor rentals, the Government may be forced to not only pay Working for Families to subsidise low wages, the housing supplement to cover the high cost of housing but also a power subsidy for those who can afford to heat their homes.

malik aayan said…
I truly like to reading your post. Thank you so much for taking the time to share such a nice information.solar panels for petrol station

Popular Posts