Aaron Gilmore is Not an Aberration
What really concerns me about the
on-going farce that surrounds the obviously duplicitous Aaron Gilmore is
that it is bringing Parliament and our MPs into further disrepute. Already
politicians are not regarded as very trustworthy according to surveys.
When our leaders should be setting
examples and maintaining high standards we are seeing serious issues brushed
aside and members being taken at their word when the evidence clearly says
otherwise. I have met few people who really believe John Banks told the truth
and Hekia Parata has been caught out providing deliberate misinformation so
often that I have stopped counting. The Prime Minister himself is having to change
his story and recover forgotten memories on a regular basis.
Gilmore was accepted by National as an
MP despite a past history of concerning behaviour. When a prospective candidate
presents a CV with false
qualifications:
"Two years ago, the CV posted on
Gilmore's Parliament web page was found to have incorrectly accredited him with
being a member of Chartered Financial Analyst (CFA) Institute - a membership he
had never had - as well as having a high-level finance-sector qualification he
did not. He blamed the latter on the Parliamentary Service."
...one would think his future parliamentary career would have ended at that point. He obviously had difficulties with the truth.
...one would think his future parliamentary career would have ended at that point. He obviously had difficulties with the truth.
Despite recent txt revelations the Prime
Minister is still open about Gilmore remaining as an
MP until the next election. It appears that he sees it acceptable to
pay someone almost $150,000 a year, plus expenses, who will be given few
responsibilities. The Prime Minister's underpaid
cleaner will be providing better value to the country.
We should expect high ethical standards
from our parliamentary representatives and standards seem to be
plummeting. Colleagues of mine have been shocked at the treatment they
have received from Government MPs when they have made submissions to select
committees. There is often no respect given to those who have spent time to
present a genuine view that may be different to the Government line. This just
makes a farce of the democratic process.
This political climate is even reflected
in how people are engaging in political discussions in blogs and social media.
The Whale Oil blog continually has people making comments that in any other
forum would be offensive and libelous. I find it hugely concerning that we
can't debate ideas and win by the strengths of our arguments alone and winning
respect through actions and deeds rather than by resorting to ridicule, threats
and bullying.
Aaron Gilmore is probably not an
aberration, he is a National MP who hadn't quite learned to manage his public
face. Ex MP, Michael Laws,
even attempts to claim that such behaviour is not unusual and that we shouldn't
expect higher standards from our public representatives.
Sadly it seems all's fair in love and
war...and politics.
Comments
I wouldn't worry too much. There have always been bullies. There have always been people who use unending offensiveness to get attention.
Why do you only hear about the recent ones? Because, when they're gone, they're very soon forgotten.