Budget Winners and Losers
The
biggest winner in this budget is tourism (40% increase) followed by the Prime
Minister’s Office and the Cabinet (18% increase). The Biggest losers are
Statistics NZ (a 30% cut) and environmental protection (10.2% less). Health will
have cuts in real terms with the smallest increase (2%).
It
does appear to me that there will be more money spent on Government spin, while
the data revealing the real state of our nation will be limited (five yearly
environmental reporting and analysis has already been wiped). $36 million extra
will go to promoting our apparent clean green environment for tourists and another
$14 million will be cut from the already struggling departments that are
charged with protecting it.
270,000
children are suffering in substandard housing, third world diseases and from
malnutrition. After four years there is still very little in the budget to
address it. The $3.4 million of extra funding being spent on the Cabinet and
Prime Minister would buy a lot of lunches for hungry kids.
The
Government is determined to maintain the $2 billion a year loss in revenue
through the non-neutral tax cuts to upper income earners. It has allowed
another bubble to occur in the property market so that the average house price
in Auckland has rocketed to $735,000, and is predicted to reach a million in
3-4 years. The $15 billion the Government promised Christchurch is being drip
fed and only a fraction has been spent, while many families have spent 2 years
in shocking conditions.
I guess if you are Sky City, a property developer,
into motorway construction, or in the top quintile of earners then this budget is
great. If you are working on a low wage, homeless, caring for a family, living
in a broken Christchurch home, are a hungry kid or are waiting for your local
river to be cleaned up then it is a case of making the most of the crumbs being
dropped.
Comments