Valuing our Ecosystem Services

































The Royal Society of New Zealand has highlighted the importance of natural ecosystems as providers of services that benefit human wellbeing and suggest these need to be included in economic decision making. For Green supporters this is not a revolutionary idea but the Royal Society has articulated the concept well: 

"The natural economy provides us with many natural ‘goods and services’, but most are not considered in economic valuations, says a new paper released by the Royal Society of New Zealand.
In its “Ecosystem Services” paper the Royal Society describes how ecosystem services or processes benefit human wellbeing and the need to include these in economic decision-making. It says when these ecosystem services are not recognised in the marketplace, it leads to decision-making failures.
Examples of ecosystems services are forests reducing soil erosion, shellfish filtering water pollution, unfarmed areas improving natural pest control on nearby farmland, and ecosystems providing recreation and cultural value."

My concern at our monocultural farming practices and the dangerous loss of biodiversity is covered well in the supporting paper:

The complex relationship between biodiversity and ecosystem services

Biodiversity is often valued for providing resilience to environmental change. More biodiversity generally leads to more resilience, but the relationship is rarely simple. Ecosystem functions, such as nutrient regula- tion, are provided by the traits of organisms within that ecosystem. Greater genetic diversity provides a greater reservoir of traits that can replace traits lost if particularly important species are lost. More diversity also provides more opportunity for functions to oper- ate across a broader range of conditions. In this way, biodiversity provides the insurance value that future environmental changes will not reduce services.

Biodiversity itself provides existence value and option value (in this case, the value of preserving the benefits of unknown future uses of currently-unused species and the opportunity for current use of those species).
The past fifty years have seen a “substantial and largely irreversible loss” of biodiversity. New Zealand’s unique endemic biodiversity has similarly seen serious decline—an unknown but large loss of com- mon wealth and natural heritage.

The Society is organising a workshop on August 9 to explore how to implement ecosystem services thinking in a policy context and I think it deserves support.

Comments

bsprout said…
I'm not sure why there is a large space above my text on this post. It doesn't exist when I edit it, any ideas?
robertguyton said…
If you've cut and pasted something from another source it sometimes brings its formatting (and its large font size or spaces) with it and it's very hard to get rid of.
bsprout said…
Thanks for your feedback, Robert. I did think that myself but considering the beginning text is mine it doesn't quite explain what happened in this instance. I even transferred the whole post to a word document and returned it with the same result. :-(

Popular posts from this blog

NZ now ranks at bottom of developed world

Turei slaps Pakeha privilege in the face!

National, Dead Party Walking...