Personal views on politics, education and the environment from a Deep South perspective. Dave Kennedy
Whoops!
Get link
Facebook
X
Pinterest
Email
Other Apps
-
I have just removed a post for the first time after receiving a range of responses. What was intended as a bit of provocative fun probably went too far.
Good on you, sprout. Never bring up the topic of which side the toilet paper should unroll from, ever again! Wall or user-side, it's too sensitive a subject, even for an open-minded reader-ship such as yours!
I can't help being amused by the role reversal here, Robert. ;-)
I had some interesting thoughts expressed on Facebook about it, too. The other interesting part about this is that I thought I might still leave a link to the article and the research that sparked it all and couldn't find it, however there were heaps of other studies done around the world producing similar results. I will leave such pursuits to the likes of Bomber in future.
Pity about removing the post. Seemed clear to me that it was written in jest. In regards to your comment; my argument was made more of an idealogical one. I certainly do not endorse National's current approach to governing.
owlinalarkworld, although a number of people enjoyed reading the removed post I did receive a few comments as well as your own that questioned its value. I thought it best to remove it if it was going to have unintended consequences.
Please continue to comment and challenge my thinking.
The NBR rich list has been published for 2025. The combined wealth of the 130 listed is $102.1 billion. In 2015 the 180 individuals and families listed had a combined wealth of $55 billion . According to the Reserve bank inflation calculator the percentage of change over the last decade was 32.9%. Given that the 2025 list is much smaller than that in 2015, the increase in wealth for those on the list must be well over 3x that of inflation. For some years average household wealth has decreased . Since 1980s and 90s, when New Zealand experienced the fastest growing inequality in the OECD, we have become so used to this wealth capture by a privileged few that when each wealth list is published, it receives minimal attention. When there are criticisms of the systems that favour the rich the current government dismisses it as envy , while continuing to gift even more advantage to the already wealthy. The $2.9 billion tax break f...
I was interested in David Seymour's public presentation of the Justice Select Committee's report after the submissions to the Treaty Principles Bill. I noted the arguments he presented and fact checked him. I welcome corrections and additions to what I have written but want to keep the responses concise. The Treaty of Waitangi does not represent a partnership. WRONG : Te Tiriti o Waitangi is a foundational document of New Zealand, establishing a relationship of partnership between the Crown and Māori. The principle of partnership, which requires the Crown and Māori to work in partnership in the governance, design, delivery, and monitoring of services, is a key aspect of the Treaty. All kiwis should be equal in their human rights before the law. DELIBERATELY MISLEADING : The Treaty of Waitangi is New Zealand's own unique statement of human rights. It includes both universal human rights and Indigenous rights. At a basic level of human rights we are treated the same, howeve...
In 2008 New Zealand was internationally ranked in the top seven for educational achievement, and when you compared us with other countries that were also culturally diverse and experiencing growing inequality, we were extremely successful. At that time our Early Childhood sector had received a much overdue boost in funding from the Labour Government after being underfunded (as a % of GDP) compared to other OECD nations for years. The sector was working towards a target of having 100% qualified teachers in all centres. We were also in the process of implementing a new National Curriculum and a complementary curriculum for Maori ( Te Marautanga o Aotearoa ). Teachers were excited about putting all their energies into the new ideas and approaches that were espoused in these co-constructed documents that had taken around seven years to review and write. Evidence, research and practitioner input had created something that would allow us to prepare New Zealand children to become ...
Comments
Wall or user-side, it's too sensitive a subject, even for an open-minded reader-ship such as yours!
I had some interesting thoughts expressed on Facebook about it, too. The other interesting part about this is that I thought I might still leave a link to the article and the research that sparked it all and couldn't find it, however there were heaps of other studies done around the world producing similar results. I will leave such pursuits to the likes of Bomber in future.
In regards to your comment; my argument was made more of an idealogical one. I certainly do not endorse National's current approach to governing.
Please continue to comment and challenge my thinking.
"Role reversal" - was that intentional?
If so, you're the King!