John Key Has No Mandate For Asset Sales!
Looking skyward and whistling is not listening!
When the National led Government struggles to explain or justify its policies it resorts to its trump card "we have a mandate".
This claim was first used when the introduction of
National Standards in Eduction met widespread criticism. National had indeed
promoted the Standards in their 2008 election campaign and there was broad
support for them, but there was no detail in the policy and the justification
for them had no professional basis. What was introduced as the National
Standards has struggled to deliver the clarity of reporting that was claimed
nor have they made any perceptable difference to those struggling children who
were purportedly going to benefit from their introduction. The National Party
has still not delivered on this "mandated" policy.
The National Party received a tenuous mandate to
govern when elected in 2011, their claim that the election was a resounding victory
is a huge exaggeration. In one of the worst turnouts in New Zealand's election
history (74%) National failed to win a clear majority with only 47% of the vote and
therefore 53% of those who voted did not vote for them. The election was
not fought on policy as National has tried to claim but on the personality of
John Key and some of his popularity was based on the perception that he
listened and responded to public concerns. Even during the election
campaign the policy of a partial sale of state assets was not well supported
and the details behind it were deliberately hidden. Not only did
National block close scrutiny of their asset sale policy but they refused to
share any of their policies on our national broadcaster's election website. If the sale of state assets
was a major pillar of their campaign then this was not well promoted and voters
were not provided with the information to vote on this in an informed way.
To progress the asset sales the Government has had to
pass new laws and 1430 written submissions to the related "Mixed Ownership
Model" legislation were received and 100 of those submissions were
presented orally to the Finance and Expenditure Select Committee.
Practically all submissions (1421) were opposed to the Government's plans and, given
the enormity of these plans, one would expect full and careful consideration of
the evidence provided. Not only were submitters treated with some disdain from
the National Party members of the committee but the chair, Todd McClay,
demanded that the deliberations be cut by six weeks. This undemocratic process became even more
pronounced when it was revealed that Treasury Officials had written their
final report before all the submissions had been fully heard and
considered.
With the sudden change to the original timeline the
Green Party were forced to present their rushed minority report without the opportunity to
circulate it amongst their caucus, totally against existing conventions. The
bill was passed last night with a majority of one
(61/60).
Grey Power, New Zealand's University Student's
Association and the CTU have joined forces with the Green and Labour Parties to
promote a petition demanding a citizen's initiated referendum on the asset
sales. Russel Norman has requested (due to the mounting evidence from most opinion polls, the submissions to the
select committee and the minimal majority in passing the bill) that the sales
be delayed until December when the strength of the petition can be ascertained.
The request was brushed aside and Mighty River will be up for sale after this
July.
This National led Government has not given due
diligence to either establishing the long term value of the asset sales nor to
ensure good democratic process is followed. John Key led a personality
based election campaign that largely relied on the public perception that he
listens to public concerns and his election was a actually just a mandate for
him to continue listening. John Key has no mandate to sell our state assets and
he has stopped listening!
Russel Norman's excellent speech against the bill provided the facts against National's fiction.
Russel Norman's excellent speech against the bill provided the facts against National's fiction.
Comments